In a recent legal ruling on an appeal by a police official against a trial court’s decision, the court emphasized the need for irrefutable evidence to substantiate both the demand for and acceptance of a bribe. The burden of establishing this case beyond any reasonable doubt squarely rests with the prosecution.
Delhi High Court overturns the lower court orders.
Reasonable Doubt and Burden of Proof
The court made it abundantly clear that in this particular case, the prosecution failed to provide conclusive evidence, whether direct or indirect, to establish the foundational facts of the bribe demand and acceptance. Consequently, it is deemed unsafe and impermissible to uphold the appellant’s conviction.
Best 100 books for Health and Personal Development
Delhi High Court Judgement
Verdict: Appeal Allowed, Conviction Set Aside
As a result of these considerations, the court ruled in favor of the appellant in the Criminal Appeal. The conviction and sentence issued by the learned Special Judge in Delhi have been overturned.
